Employment Status in the United States and Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception or Moderately Effective Contraception before and after the Affordable Care Act: National Survey of Family Growth 2006–2010 and 2015–2017

Abstract

Employment status has been previously associated with contraceptive use among women of reproductive age. We assessed the association between employment status and method of contraception among US women of reproductive age, before and after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) passed in 2010. We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG): 2006–2010 survey for our pre-ACA analysis and 2015–2017 survey for post-ACA analysis. We combined the use of moderately-effective or long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) as the main study outcome. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted prevalence odds ratios (aPOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Our study included 5,572 women pre-ACA and 2,340 women post-ACA. Pre-ACA, non-Hispanic white women who were employed were significantly more likely to use moderately-effective or LARC contraceptives (aPOR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.28, 2.14), but post-ACA, this association was non-significant (aPOR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.67, 1.33). Findings were not significant for other race/ethnic groups in either time frame. Our study shows that being employed was no longer associated with contraceptive method during a post-ACA time period among non-Hispanic white women. Modifications to the ACA should be scrutinized to further evaluate the impact it may have on women’s access to moderately-effective or LARC contraception.

Keywords

• Affordable Care Act
• Contraception
• Employment
• Family planning
• Health Insurance