Molecular Medicine (Jan 2023)

Urine-based multi-omic comparative analysis of COVID-19 and bacterial sepsis-induced ARDS

  • Richa Batra,
  • Rie Uni,
  • Oleh M. Akchurin,
  • Sergio Alvarez-Mulett,
  • Luis G. Gómez-Escobar,
  • Edwin Patino,
  • Katherine L. Hoffman,
  • Will Simmons,
  • William Whalen,
  • Kelsey Chetnik,
  • Mustafa Buyukozkan,
  • Elisa Benedetti,
  • Karsten Suhre,
  • Edward Schenck,
  • Soo Jung Cho,
  • Augustine M. K. Choi,
  • Frank Schmidt,
  • Mary E. Choi,
  • Jan Krumsiek

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-023-00609-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 29, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a life-threatening condition during critical illness, is a common complication of COVID-19. It can originate from various disease etiologies, including severe infections, major injury, or inhalation of irritants. ARDS poses substantial clinical challenges due to a lack of etiology-specific therapies, multisystem involvement, and heterogeneous, poor patient outcomes. A molecular comparison of ARDS groups holds the potential to reveal common and distinct mechanisms underlying ARDS pathogenesis. Methods We performed a comparative analysis of urine-based metabolomics and proteomics profiles from COVID-19 ARDS patients (n = 42) and bacterial sepsis-induced ARDS patients (n = 17). To this end, we used two different approaches, first we compared the molecular omics profiles between ARDS groups, and second, we correlated clinical manifestations within each group with the omics profiles. Results The comparison of the two ARDS etiologies identified 150 metabolites and 70 proteins that were differentially abundant between the two groups. Based on these findings, we interrogated the interplay of cell adhesion/extracellular matrix molecules, inflammation, and mitochondrial dysfunction in ARDS pathogenesis through a multi-omic network approach. Moreover, we identified a proteomic signature associated with mortality in COVID-19 ARDS patients, which contained several proteins that had previously been implicated in clinical manifestations frequently linked with ARDS pathogenesis. Conclusion In summary, our results provide evidence for significant molecular differences in ARDS patients from different etiologies and a potential synergy of extracellular matrix molecules, inflammation, and mitochondrial dysfunction in ARDS pathogenesis. The proteomic mortality signature should be further investigated in future studies to develop prediction models for COVID-19 patient outcomes.

Keywords