Evaluation of Real-time Precise Point Positioning with Ambiguity Resolution Based on Multi-GNSS OSB Products from CNES

Abstract

Ambiguity resolution (AR) is a core technology that helps to speed up convergence time and increase positioning accuracy for precise point positioning (PPP), and the performance of PPP-AR is based on the quality of ambiguity resolution products. Real-time PPP-AR becomes a reality as users can now obtain publicly accessible real-time observable-specific signal bias (OSB) products from the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES). Therefore, an analysis of the quality of OSB products and an evaluation of the performance of PPP-AR are required to promote the application of real-time positioning. For a total of 31 days between day of year (DOY) 121 and 151 in 2021, observation data were collected from 90 stations, and the OSB products were used to assess the experiments. As for the quality of the OSB products, the data availability (DA) of the GPS and Galileo satellites was greater than 97%, whereas that of BDS was less than 60%; the maximum fluctuation value (MAX) and standard deviation (STD) of the GPS, Galileo, and BDS satellites were 0.045 and 0.012; 0.081 and 0.028; and 0.292 and 0.085 cycles, respectively. In terms of ambiguity residuals using the OSB products, the wide-lane (WL) residual percentages within ±0.25 cycles for the GPS, Galileo, BDS-2, and BDS-3 systems were more than 92%, and the narrow-lane (NL) residual percentages within ±0.25 cycles for the four systems were 92%, 89%, 79%, and 60%, respectively. With regard to the performance of PPP-AR, the GPS+Galileo solution showed the best performance in the kinematic positioning mode, in which the mean root mean square (RMS) of positioning accuracy was 1.06, 1.27, and 2.85 cm for the east (E), north (N), and up (U) components, respectively, and the mean convergence time reached 9.6 min. In the static positioning mode, the mean convergence times of the GPS-only and GPS+Galileo solutions were 11.4 min and 8.0 min, respectively, and both of their mean RMS for positioning accuracy reached 0.79, 0.95, and 1.48 cm for the E, N, and U components, respectively. However, the addition of BDS did not further enhance the performance of multi-GNSS PPP-AR in either the kinematic or static positioning mode due to the poor quality of the real-time BDS products. More importantly, a prediction method was proposed to avoid re-convergence and to enhance the reliability of PPP-AR in the event of short-time missing real-time OSB products and to improve the positioning accuracy and the ambiguity fixed rate.

Keywords

• real-time
• precise point positioning
• ambiguity resolution
• OSB products