Molecular Cytogenetics (Jan 2012)

"Familial" versus "sporadic" intellectual disability: contribution of subtelomeric rearrangements

  • Rafati Maryam,
  • Ghadirzadeh Mohammad R,
  • Heshmati Yaser,
  • Adibi Homeira,
  • Keihanidoust Zarrintaj,
  • Eshraghian Mohammad R,
  • Dastan Jila,
  • Hoseini Azadeh,
  • Purhoseini Marzieh,
  • Ghaffari Saeed R

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-5-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 1
p. 4

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Cryptic subtelomeric rearrangements have been proposed as a significant cause of sporadic intellectual disability (ID) but the role of such aberrations in familial ID has not yet been studied. As positive family history of ID had been proposed as an important and significant predicting factor of subtelomeric rearrangements, it was assumed that the contribution of subtelomeric aberrations in familial ID would be much more than the sporadic ones. Three hundred and twenty two patients from 102 unrelated families with more than two ID patients in the first degree relatives have been investigated. Assessment of subtelomeric rearrangements were carried out using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) technique. Detected aberrations were then confirmed by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) method. Results Among the families studied, 27.4% had 4-12, 36.3% had 3 and 36.3% had 2 affected individuals in the first degree relatives. One unbalanced translocation and 4 polymorphic changes were detected. The prevalence of clinically significant subtelomeric rearrangements was 0.98%. Conclusion This is the first investigation of subtelomeric aberrations in a large sample set of familial ID patients. Our results show that the contribution of subtelomeric rearrangements to familial ID is not as much as what had been determined for sporadic ones in the literature. Moreover, this study shows that the positive family history by alone, cannot be the most important and determining indicator of subtelomeric aberrations while it would be a good predicting factor when associated with dysmorphism or congenital malformations. These findings propose that other cryptic chromosomal abnormalities or even single gene disorders may be the main cause of familial ID rather than subtelomeric aberrations.

Keywords