F1000Research (Oct 2019)

Case Report: Bladder adenocarcinoma: primary or urachal? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 not approved]

  • J. Eduardo Tejeda-Mariaca,
  • Marco Ordoñez-Alcantara,
  • Aldo Bello-Sedano,
  • Victor Perez-Cornejo,
  • J. Antonio Grandez-Urbina

DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20106.1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

Background: Bladder adenocarcinoma (AC) is a scarce histological variant and there are few studies on its proper management. No previous case reports present the management of a urachal tumor and the incidental finding of bladder adenocarcinoma. Clinical case: We present the case of a young woman with nonspecific symptoms, who presented with a prior history of dysuria, bladder tenesmus, suprapubic pain and urinary urgency for one year, which had been treated as recurrent urinary tract infection. A partial cystectomy plus extended lymphadenectomy was scheduled. We found a bladder tumor with characteristics of a urachal tumor and the pathological report indicated a primary bladder AC. The patient had a complete recovery at one year of follow-up. Conclusions: A patient can present with a tumor with urachal characteristics; however, the pathology report can show primary AC. The decision to perform partial cystectomy was an appropriate option for the location of this tumor, with optimal surgical results. Still, a long-term follow-up is necessary. More specific management guidelines are required for the treatment of AC.