Cancers (Sep 2021)

<i>gsp</i> Mutation Is Not a Molecular Biomarker of Long-Term Response to First-Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly

  • Luiz Eduardo Wildemberg,
  • Daniel Henriques,
  • Paula C. L. Elias,
  • Carlos Henrique de A. Lima,
  • Nina R. de Castro Musolino,
  • Aline Helen Silva Camacho,
  • Olivia Faria,
  • Debora Nazato,
  • Julio Abucham,
  • Lucio Vilar,
  • Jose Italo Mota,
  • Martha Katherine P. Huayllas,
  • Leila Chimelli,
  • Margaret de Castro,
  • Leandro Kasuki,
  • Mônica R. Gadelha

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13194857
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 19
p. 4857

Abstract

Read online

Background: It is still controversial if activating mutations in the stimulatory G-protein α subunit (gsp mutation) are a biomarker of response to first generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) treatment in acromegaly. Thus, we aimed to evaluate whether gsp mutation predicts long-term response to fg-SRL treatment and to characterize the phenotype of patients harboring gsp mutations. Methods: GNAS1 sequencing was performed by Sanger. SST2 and SST5 were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and real-time RT-PCR. The cytokeratin granulation pattern was evaluated by IHC. Biochemical control was defined as GH gsp mutation was found in 54 out of 136 patients evaluated. Biochemical control with fg-SRL treatment was similar in gsp+ and gsp- patients (37% vs. 25%, p = 0.219). Tumors harboring gsp mutation were smaller (p = 0.035) and had a lower chance of invading cavernous sinuses (p = 0.001). SST5 protein (p = 0.047) and mRNA (p = 0.013) expression levels were higher in wild-type tumors. Conclusions: In this largest series available in the literature, we concluded that gsp is not a molecular biomarker of response to fg-SRL treatment in acromegaly. However, the importance of its negative association with cavernous sinus invasion and SST5 expression needs to be further investigated.

Keywords