Neoplasia: An International Journal for Oncology Research (Dec 2007)

A Feasibility Study Evaluating the Functional Diffusion Map as a Predictive Imaging Biomarker for Detection of Treatment Response in a Patient with Metastatic Prostate Cancer to the Bone

  • Kuei C. Lee,
  • Deborah A. Bradley,
  • Maha Hussain,
  • Charles R. Meyer,
  • Thomas L. Chenevert,
  • Jon A. Jacobson,
  • Timothy D. Johnson,
  • Craig J. Galban,
  • Alnawaz Rehemtulla,
  • Kenneth J. Pienta,
  • Brian D. Ross

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1593/neo.07954
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 12
pp. 1003 – 1011

Abstract

Read online

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in American men with a subset inevitably presenting with metastatic disease to the bone. A wellrecognized limitation in evaluating new treatments for metastatic PCa is the inability to use imaging to objectively assess response therapy. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of clinically translating the functional diffusion map (fDM) imaging biomarker for quantifying the spatiotemporal effects of bone tumor response in a patient treated for metastatic PCa with bone metastases. A patient beginning therapy was scanned using MRI before treatment and again at 2 and 8 weeks post-treatment initiation to quantify changes in tumor diffusion values. Three metastatic lesions were identified for f DM analysis, all of which all demonstrated an early increase in diffusion values at 2 weeks, which increased further at 8 weeks post-treatment initiation. This finding correlated with a decrease in the patient's prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels suggestive of patient response. CT, bone scans, anatomic MRI images obtained posttreatment were found to be uninformative for the assessment of treatment effectiveness. This study presents the feasibility of f DM measurements in osseous lesions over time and shows that changes in f DM values were consistent with therapeutic response. Thus, the fDM imaging biomarker may provide a quantifiable therapeutic endpoint to assess response in patients with metastatic bone cancer.

Keywords