A comparative analysis of bacterial adhesion on different long-term provisional fixed prostheses fabricated by CAD/CAM milling, 3D printing, and heat cure technique: An In Vivo study

Abstract

Objectives: This study compares the bacterial susceptibility to three different provisional restorations manufactured with different laboratory techniques, i.e., heat cure, CAD/CAM, and 3D printing. Materials and Methods: Totally, 45 health patients with age group of 30–60 years undergoing complete veneer crown treatment were selected for the study and divided into three groups with 15 samples in each as Group I: the crowns were made from polymethyl methacrylate polymer fabricated by the conventional heat cure method, Group 2: the crowns were made from polymethyl methacrylate fabricated by subtractive manufacturing CAD/CAM method, and Group 3: the crowns were made from oligomers fabricated by additive manufacturing 3D printing. The samples were examined for bacterial adherence at scanning electron microscope. The colony-forming units (CFUs) were calculated, and statistically analyzed. Results: It has been determined that the digitally fabricated provisional restorations prove to be superior in terms of surface topography than to the conventionally fabricated provisional restorations. Conclusion: The study concludes that 3D-printed provisional restorations are more precise with reduced bacterial susceptibility than milled ones.

Keywords

• 3dprinting
• bacterial susceptibility
• cad/cam
• pmma polymethyl methacrylate