Journal of Psychiatry Spectrum (Jan 2025)

Efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Neha V. Mattikoppa,
  • G. S Harshitha,
  • Gazzali Kassim M. Yahiya,
  • Manasa Sudhir Paluru

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jopsys.jopsys_23_24
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 1
pp. 111 – 120

Abstract

Read online

Background: Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a novel third-wave therapy becoming popular in the management of various anxiety disorders. In this systematic review, we wish to gather the data that have been studied to determine the effectiveness of ACT in treating social anxiety disorder (SAD). Methods: This study followed standard systematic review guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO prior to undertaking the review. Databases, namely PubMed, PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE, and gray literature (ClinicalTrials.gov, BASE) with relevant keywords, were searched from inception to February 2024. Randomized controlled trials encompassing both clinical and nonclinical populations aged more than 10 years diagnosed with SAD were included. These trials compared ACT with wait list controls (n = 6) and cognitive behavioral therapy (n = 3). The primary outcome focused on the reduction of symptoms associated with social anxiety, while quality of life served as a secondary outcome. Measures of effect were determined through pre-test and post-test mean values, alongside their respective standard deviations. The random effect model was used to calculate pooled effect size. The quality of the included papers was assessed using Cochrane RoB-1. Covidence software was used for the initial selection of studies, and meta-analyses were performed using RevMan software. Results: From the initial 442 study records that were searched, finally 9 studies were included for the systematic review, of which 6 studies were found suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled estimate for studies comparing ACT with wait list found that the overall effect size for social anxiety symptoms was g = −1.28 (95% confidence interval of -1.88, -0.69) favoring ACT intervention significantly. Conclusion: This review found that ACT is efficacious in treating SAD. Most of the studies included were conducted in adolescent females. Varying ACT intervention modalities were incorporated, with the primary outcome assessed using a range of scales. The results of our meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution because of heterogeneity and smaller number of studies being included. ACT can be considered a psychotherapeutic option for the management of SAD.

Keywords