JMIR Formative Research (Aug 2024)

Creating a Culturally Safe Online Data Collection Instrument to Measure Vaccine Confidence Among Indigenous Youth: Indigenous Consensus Method

  • Marion Maar,
  • Caleigh Bourdon,
  • Joahnna Berti,
  • Emma Bisaillon,
  • Lisa Boesch,
  • Alicia Boston,
  • Justin Chapdelaine,
  • Alison Humphrey,
  • Sandeep Kumar,
  • Benjamin Maar-Jackson,
  • Robert Martell,
  • Bruce Naokwegijig,
  • Davinder Preet Kaur,
  • Sarah Rice,
  • Barbara Rickaby,
  • Mariette Sutherland,
  • Maurianne Reade

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/52884
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8
p. e52884

Abstract

Read online

Background Participating in surveys can shape the perception of participants related to the study topic. Administering a vaccine hesitancy questionnaire can have negative impacts on participants’ vaccine confidence. This is particularly true for online and cross-cultural data collection because culturally safe health education to correct misinformation is typically not provided after the administration of an electronic survey. Objective To create a culturally safe, online, COVID-19 vaccine confidence survey for Indigenous youth designed to collect authentic, culturally relevant data of their vaccine experiences, with a low risk of contributing to further vaccine confusion among participants. Methods Using the Aboriginal Telehealth Knowledge Circle consensus method, a team of academics, health care providers, policy makers, and community partners reviewed COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy surveys used in public health research, analyzed potential risks, and created a framework for electronic Indigenous vaccine confidence surveys as well as survey items. Results The framework for safer online survey items is based on 2 principles, a first do-no-harm approach and applying a strengths-based lens. Relevant survey domains identified in the process include sociodemographic information, participants’ connection to their community, preferred sources for health information, vaccination uptake among family members and peers, as well as personal attitudes toward vaccines. A total of 44 survey items were developed, including 5 open-ended items to improve the authenticity of the data and the analysis of the experiences of Indigenous youth. Conclusions Using an Indigenous consensus method, we have developed an online COVID-19 vaccine confidence survey with culturally relevant domains and reduced the risk of amplifying misinformation and negative impacts on vaccine confidence among Indigenous participants. Our approach can be adapted to other online survey development in collaboration with Indigenous communities.