PLoS ONE (Jan 2014)

Transcriptomic meta-analysis of multiple sclerosis and its experimental models.

  • Barbara B R Raddatz,
  • Florian Hansmann,
  • Ingo Spitzbarth,
  • Arno Kalkuhl,
  • Ulrich Deschl,
  • Wolfgang Baumgärtner,
  • Reiner Ulrich

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086643
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 1
p. e86643

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND: Multiple microarray analyses of multiple sclerosis (MS) and its experimental models have been published in the last years. OBJECTIVE: Meta-analyses integrate the information from multiple studies and are suggested to be a powerful approach in detecting highly relevant and commonly affected pathways. DATA SOURCES: ArrayExpress, Gene Expression Omnibus and PubMed databases were screened for microarray gene expression profiling studies of MS and its experimental animal models. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies comparing central nervous system (CNS) samples of diseased versus healthy individuals with n >1 per group and publically available raw data were selected. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Included conditions for re-analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were MS, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in rats, proteolipid protein-induced EAE in mice, Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus-induced demyelinating disease (TMEV-IDD), and a transgenic tumor necrosis factor-overexpressing mouse model (TNFtg). Since solely a single MS raw data set fulfilled the inclusion criteria, a merged list containing the DEGs from two MS-studies was additionally included. Cross-study analysis was performed employing list comparisons of DEGs and alternatively Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). RESULTS: The intersection of DEGs in MS, EAE, TMEV-IDD, and TNFtg contained 12 genes related to macrophage functions. The intersection of EAE, TMEV-IDD and TNFtg comprised 40 DEGs, functionally related to positive regulation of immune response. Over and above, GSEA identified substantially more differentially regulated pathways including coagulation and JAK/STAT-signaling. CONCLUSION: A meta-analysis based on a simple comparison of DEGs is over-conservative. In contrast, the more experimental GSEA approach identified both, a priori anticipated as well as promising new candidate pathways.