Frontiers in Pharmacology (Dec 2022)

Pharmacist-led olaparib follow-up service for ambulatory ovarian cancer patients: A prospective study in a tertiary specialized cancer hospital in China

  • Yanting Wang,
  • Di Du,
  • Di Du,
  • Jun Yang,
  • Alan H. Lau,
  • Yuanyuan Dai,
  • Yuanyuan Dai,
  • Wangjun Qin,
  • Ning Li,
  • Guohui Li

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1037726
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: To establish a pharmacist-led olaparib follow-up program for ovarian cancer patients, provide patient education, get information on adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and identify and manage drug-related problems.Methods: Ambulatory adult patients with ovarian cancer receiving olaparib were enrolled. At least one follow-up session was conducted by clinical pharmacists. Pharmacists collected data on the type and grade of ADRs, drug adherence, olaparib dosing, concomitant medications, and pharmacists’ suggestions.Results: 83 patients were enrolled with the median age of 58. The average number of the follow-up sessions provided to each patient was 1.31, and the average duration of each follow-up was 17.78 min. The olaparib starting dose for most patients (97.59%) was 600 mg/d. 36.14% of the patients had missed olaparib doses and 27.71% of the patients had dose adjustments due to ADRs. The most common ADRs (incidence≥10%) were: fatigue (40.96%), anemia (36.14%), leukopenia (36.14%), nausea (28.92%), thrombocytopenia (16.87%), anorexia (16.87%), dyspepsia (15.66%). The tolerability profiles were generally similar between patients treated for “first-line maintenance” and those treated for “recurrence maintenance” (p > .05). There were 42% of the patients who were concomitantly taking medications without exact chemical contents (such as formulated Chinese medicines and Chinese decoctions), and common types of concomitant medications with exact drug names were antihypertensive, anti-hyperglycemic, and anti-hyperlipidemic medications. The pharmacists identified 4 clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in two patients. Pharmacists made 196 suggestions mainly related to rational use of the medications and management of ADRs.Conclusion: The study provides the first report about pharmacist-led follow-up service for olaparib. The types of ADRs were similar to those previously observed in clinical trials, and the profiles of ADRs in different types of patients (first-line maintenance vs. recurrence maintenance) were also similar. Pharmacists identified drug-related problems (such as adherence, DDIs and management of ADRs) and offer suggestions for the patients.

Keywords