Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health (Sep 2015)

Predictors of permanent work disability among ≤50-year-old patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

  • Jarmo Gunn,
  • Tuomas Kiviniemi,
  • Fausto Biancari,
  • Olli Kajander,
  • Timo Mäkikallio,
  • Markku Eskola,
  • Erkki Ilveskoski,
  • Kari Korpilahti,
  • Jan-Ola Wistbacka,
  • Vesa Anttila,
  • Jouni Heikkinen,
  • Jaakko Airaksinen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3508
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 41, no. 5
pp. 460 – 466

Abstract

Read online

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the incidence and periprocedural predictors of permanent work disability (PWD) pension among patients ≤50 years old who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Patient records of 910 consecutive patients undergoing PCI at four Finnish hospitals in 2002–2012 were reviewed for baseline and procedural data and late adverse events. Data on permanent work disability (PWD) pension allocation were acquired from the Finnish Centre for Pensions, which governs the statutory pension security in Finland. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 41 [standard deviation (SD) 31] months. Altogether 103/910 (11.3%) of patients were on PWD by the end of follow-up, 60 (58.3%) for cardiac diagnoses (cumulative freedom from PWD 81% at 7 years). Independent predictors of PWD were post procedural stroke [hazard ratio (HR) 4.7, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.8–11.9], post procedural myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.8–6.0), diabetes (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1–3.7), discharge diuretics (HR 3.5, 95% CI 2.1–5.9), and increasing age (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.3). Predictors of PWD for cardiac diagnoses were post procedural stroke and MI, discharge diuretics, and use of calcium-channel blockers, diabetes and older age. CONCLUSIONS: Patients ≤50 years old undergoing PCI are at a high risk for subsequent permanent disability for cardiac diagnoses. This finding underscores the need for reinforcing adherence to secondary prevention by cardiac rehabilitation and early collaboration with occupational health care professionals.

Keywords