Haematologica (Jul 2022)

Allogeneic transplant following CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma

  • Joanna Zurko,
  • Jeremy Ramdial,
  • Mazyar Shadman,
  • Sairah Ahmed,
  • Aniko Szabo,
  • Lorenzo Iovino,
  • Ana Alarcon Tomas,
  • Craig Sauter,
  • Miguel-Angel Perales,
  • Nirav. N. Shah,
  • Utkarsh H. Acharya,
  • Caron Jacobson,
  • Robert J. Soiffer,
  • Trent Wang,
  • Krishna V. Komanduri,
  • Samantha Jaglowski,
  • Adam S. Kittai,
  • Nathan Denlinger,
  • Madiha Iqbal,
  • Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja,
  • Ernesto Ayala,
  • Julio Chavez,
  • Michael Jain,
  • Frederick L. Locke,
  • Yazeed Samara,
  • Lihua E. Budde,
  • Matthew G. Mei,
  • Alexandra Della Pia,
  • Tatyana Feldman,
  • Nausheen Ahmed,
  • Ryan Jacobs,
  • Nilanjan Ghosh,
  • Bhagirathbhai Dholaria,
  • Olalekan O. Oluwole,
  • Brian Hess,
  • Ayesha Hassan,
  • Vaishalee P. Kenkre,
  • Patrick Reagan,
  • Farrukh Awan,
  • Yago Nieto,
  • Mehdi Hamadani,
  • Alex F. Herrera

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2022.281242
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 108, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) can potentially salvage large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients experiencing treatment failure after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T). Nonetheless, data on the efficacy and toxicities of alloHCT after receipt of CAR T are limited. We report a multicenter retrospective study assessing the safety, toxicities, and outcomes of alloHCT in LBCL patients following CAR T failure. Eighty-eight patients with relapsed, refractory LBCL received an alloHCT following anti-CD19 CAR T failure. The median number of lines of therapy between CAR T infusion and alloHCT was one (range, 0-7). Low intensity conditioning was used in 77% (n=68) and peripheral blood was the most common graft source (86%, n=76). The most common donor types were matched unrelated donor (39%), followed by haploidentical (30%) and matched related donor (26%). Median follow-up of survivors was 15 months (range, 1-72). One-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and graft-versus-host disease-free relapse-free survival were 59%, 45%, and 39% respectively. One-year non-relapse mortality and progression/relapse were 22% and 33% respectively. On multivariate analysis, <2 lines of intervening therapy between CAR T and alloHCT and complete response at time of alloHCT were associated with better outcomes. In conclusion, alloHCT after CAR T failure can provide durable remissions in a subset of patients.