Private Security and Privatizing Security from Different Theoretical Perspectives

Abstract

In this qualitative study, the reflection of private security on internal security is mainly discussed through the “private securitization” concept and its position in the theoretical pool. The main argument of the study is “Private security, which is seen as one of the consequences of stressful and risky lifestyles, has reached a controversial quantity by being introduced into even the most secluded points of life with its predominantly Westernized quality and quantity that different security theories can justify.” The main findings of the research are as follows: Private security has a high share in securitization; the quality-quantity balance of the sector in developed and developing countries varies; there is a need for a globally branded structure in the service; Turkey has the opportunity to restructure the sector through ancient security codes; and finally, if the current perspective of private security, which contains double standards, is maintained, there are risks that may be swung away from the legitimate ground at any time. As a result, it is concluded that “Private security cannot achieve a service standard of comprehensive effectiveness and efficiency without a training-oriented improvement”.

Keywords

• security
• private security
• private securitization
• country
• education