Journal of Water and Climate Change (Feb 2022)
Circulation type analysis of regional hydrology: the added value in using CMIP6 over CMIP5 simulations as exemplified from the MPI-ESM-LR model
Abstract
This study addresses the applicability of general circulation models (GCMs) in studying the impact of climate change on hydrology. The statistical downscaling of precipitation based on circulation types (CTs) derived from the fuzzy, i.e., more than one CTs can occur in a given day, obliquely rotated principal component analysis is suggested as a robust methodology in using climate models to research the impact of climate change on hydrology. The methodology allows understanding of the mechanism of atmospheric circulation in the study region, and the physical relationship between atmospheric circulation and the regional hydrological cycle. The capability of climate simulations from the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM) GCM to reproduce the observed CTs in the target region is examined in light of the uncertainty of atmospheric GCMs when used for circulation typing. The results were discussed and it showed that, generally, the analyzed GCM can reproduce the underlying physics of atmospheric circulation in the study region, represented by the CTs, together with their dominant periods, probability of occurrence, and annual frequency of occurrence with modest biases. Generally, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) simulation indicates some improvement for the CT-based analysis relative to the CMIP5 counterpart; however, this depends on the analyzed CT. HIGHLIGHTS Application of circulation typing to downscale rainfall.; Understanding the physical link between rainfall and large-scale atmospheric circulation.; Ability of climate simulations to reproduce observed circulation types.; Added value in using the CMIP6 simulation over the CMIP5.; Strengths and weaknesses of the GCM for circulation type analysis.;
Keywords