Exploring the Interplay of Diabetes, Deaf Patient Reported Outcomes, and Cancer Screening in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Women

Abstract

Emmanuel Perrodin-Njoku,1 Sowmya R Rao,2 Regina M Wang,3 Christopher J Moreland,4 Poorna Kushalnagar1 1Center for Deaf Health Equity, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, USA; 2Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; 3Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; 4Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USACorrespondence: Poorna Kushalnagar, Gallaudet University, 800 Florida Avenue NE, Hall Memorial Building, Washington, DC, 20002, USA, Email [email protected]: Some deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) individuals face health information barriers, increasing their risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) and subsequent cancer development. This study examines if health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and deaf patient-reported outcomes (DHH-QoL) mediate the relationship between DM diagnosis and cancer screening adherence among DHH individuals.Patients and Methods: In a cross-sectional study, US DHH adults assigned female at birth answered questions on cervical and breast cancer screenings from the ASL-English bilingual Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS-ASL) and the PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System) Deaf Profile measure’s Communication Health and Global Health domains. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained from multivariable logistic and linear regression models, examining the association between DM, DHH-QoL, and cancer screening adherence, adjusting for other covariates and HRQoL. A Baron and Kenny causal mediation analysis was used. A two-sided p < 0.05 indicated significance.Results: Most respondents were White (66.4%), heterosexual (66.2%), did not have DM (83.9%), had health insurance (95.5%), and adhered to pap smears (75.7%) and mammograms (76.9%). The average (standard deviation) DHH-QoL score was 50.9 (8.6). Those with DM had lower HRQoL scores (46.2 (9.5) vs 50.2 (8.8); p < 0.0001) than those without. Non-significant multivariable models indicate that those with DM were more adherent to pap testing (OR: 1.48; 95% CI: 0.72, 3.03; p = 0.285) and mammograms (2.18; 95% CI: 0.81, 5.88; p = 0.122), with DHH-QoL scores slightly increasing them to 1.53 (0.74, 3.16; p = 0.250) for pap testing and 2.55 (0.91, 7.13; p = 0.076) for mammograms. DHH-QoL was significantly associated with mammograms (p = 0.027), with 6% increased adherence per unit increase in the score. Overall, HRQoL and DHH-QoL were not significant mediators.Conclusion: While HRQoL/DHH-QoL in DHH individuals with DM does not mediate cancer screening adherence, higher DHH-QoL scores are associated with it. DHH-focused health literacy and communication training can improve cancer-related outcomes.Keywords: deaf, cancer screening, sign language, hearing loss, diabetes

Keywords

• deaf
• cancer screening
• sign language
• hearing loss
• diabetes