Frontiers in Nutrition (Jun 2024)

Comparison of venous and pooled capillary hemoglobin levels for the detection of anemia among adolescent girls

  • Mica Jenkins,
  • Mica Jenkins,
  • Esi Foriwa Amoaful,
  • Mutala Abdulai,
  • Veronica Quartey,
  • Ruth Situma,
  • Porbilla Ofosu-Apea,
  • Jevaise Aballo,
  • Maku E. Demuyakor,
  • Lucas Gosdin,
  • Carine Mapango,
  • Maria Elena D. Jefferds,
  • O. Yaw Addo,
  • O. Yaw Addo,
  • O. Yaw Addo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1360306
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionBlood source is a known preanalytical factor affecting hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations, and there is evidence that capillary and venous blood may yield disparate Hb levels and anemia prevalence. However, data from adolescents are scarce.ObjectiveTo compare Hb and anemia prevalence measured by venous and individual pooled capillary blood among a sample of girls aged 10–19 years from 232 schools in four regions of Ghana in 2022.MethodsAmong girls who had venous blood draws, a random subsample was selected for capillary blood. Hb was measured using HemoCue® Hb-301. We used Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) to quantify the strength of the bivariate relationship between venous and capillary Hb and a paired t-test for difference in means. We used McNemar’s test for discordance in anemia cases by blood source and weighted Kappa to quantify agreement by anemia severity. A multivariate generalized estimating equation was used to quantify adjusted population anemia prevalence and assess the association between blood source and predicted anemia risk.ResultsWe found strong concordance between Hb measures (CCC = 0.86). The difference between mean venous Hb (12.8 g/dL, ± 1.1) and capillary Hb (12.9 g/dL, ± 1.2) was not significant (p = 0.26). Crude anemia prevalence by venous and capillary blood was 20.6% and 19.5%, respectively. Adjusted population anemia prevalence was 23.5% for venous blood and 22.5% for capillary (p = 0.45). Blood source was not associated with predicted anemia risk (risk ratio: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.02). Discordance in anemia cases by blood source was not significant (McNemar p = 0.46). Weighted Kappa demonstrated moderate agreement by severity (ĸ = 0.67). Among those with anemia by either blood source (n = 111), 59% were identified by both sources.ConclusionIn Ghanaian adolescent girls, there was no difference in mean Hb, anemia prevalence, or predicted anemia risk by blood source. However, only 59% of girls with anemia by either blood source were identified as having anemia by both sources. These findings suggest that pooled capillary blood may be useful for estimating Hb and anemia at the population level, but that caution is needed when interpreting individual-level data.

Keywords