Environment International (Aug 2019)

Ultrafine particles and PM2.5 in the air of cities around the world: Are they representative of each other?

  • Alma Lorelei de Jesus,
  • Md Mahmudur Rahman,
  • Mandana Mazaheri,
  • Helen Thompson,
  • Luke D. Knibbs,
  • Cheol Jeong,
  • Greg Evans,
  • Wei Nei,
  • Aijun Ding,
  • Liping Qiao,
  • Li Li,
  • Harri Portin,
  • Jarkko V. Niemi,
  • Hilkka Timonen,
  • Krista Luoma,
  • Tuukka Petäjä,
  • Markku Kulmala,
  • Michal Kowalski,
  • Annette Peters,
  • Josef Cyrys,
  • Luca Ferrero,
  • Maurizio Manigrasso,
  • Pasquale Avino,
  • Giorgio Buonano,
  • Cristina Reche,
  • Xavier Querol,
  • David Beddows,
  • Roy M. Harrison,
  • Mohammad H. Sowlat,
  • Constantinos Sioutas,
  • Lidia Morawska

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 129
pp. 118 – 135

Abstract

Read online

Can mitigating only particle mass, as the existing air quality measures do, ultimately lead to reduction in ultrafine particles (UFP)? The aim of this study was to provide a broader urban perspective on the relationship between UFP, measured in terms of particle number concentration (PNC) and PM2.5 (mass concentration of particles with aerodynamic diameter 1 for roadside sites and <1 for urban background sites with lower values for more polluted cities. The Pearson's r ranged from 0.09 to 0.64 for the log-transformed data, indicating generally poor linear correlation between PNC and PM2.5. Therefore, PNC and PM2.5 measurements are not representative of each other; and regulating PM2.5 does little to reduce PNC. This highlights the need to establish regulatory approaches and control measures to address the impacts of elevated UFP concentrations, especially in urban areas, considering their potential health risks. Keywords: Urban aerosol, Particle number concentration, PM2.5