Journal of Clinical Medicine (Jun 2021)

Tracheostomy Timing and Outcome in Severe COVID-19: The WeanTrach Multicenter Study

  • Denise Battaglini,
  • Francesco Missale,
  • Irene Schiavetti,
  • Marta Filauro,
  • Francesca Iannuzzi,
  • Alessandro Ascoli,
  • Alberto Bertazzoli,
  • Federico Pascucci,
  • Salvatore Grasso,
  • Francesco Murgolo,
  • Simone Binda,
  • Davide Maraggia,
  • Giorgia Montrucchio,
  • Gabriele Sales,
  • Giuseppe Pascarella,
  • Felice Eugenio Agrò,
  • Gaia Faccio,
  • Sandra Ferraris,
  • Savino Spadaro,
  • Giulia Falò,
  • Nadia Mereto,
  • Alessandro Uva,
  • Jessica Giuseppina Maugeri,
  • Bellissima Agrippino,
  • Maria Vargas,
  • Giuseppe Servillo,
  • Chiara Robba,
  • Lorenzo Ball,
  • Francesco Mora,
  • Alessio Signori,
  • Antoni Torres,
  • Daniele Roberto Giacobbe,
  • Antonio Vena,
  • Matteo Bassetti,
  • Giorgio Peretti,
  • Patricia R. M. Rocco,
  • Paolo Pelosi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122651
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 12
p. 2651

Abstract

Read online

Background: Tracheostomy can be performed safely in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, little is known about the optimal timing, effects on outcome, and complications. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective, observational study. This study included 153 tracheostomized COVID-19 patients from 11 intensive care units (ICUs). The primary endpoint was the median time to tracheostomy in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Secondary endpoints were survival rate, length of ICU stay, and post-tracheostomy complications, stratified by tracheostomy timing (early versus late) and technique (surgical versus percutaneous). Results: The median time to tracheostomy was 15 (1–64) days. There was no significant difference in survival between critically ill COVID-19 patients who received tracheostomy before versus after day 15, nor between surgical and percutaneous techniques. ICU length of stay was shorter with early compared to late tracheostomy (p p = 0.050). The rate of lower respiratory tract infections was higher with surgical versus percutaneous technique (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Among critically ill patients with COVID-19, neither early nor percutaneous tracheostomy improved outcomes, but did shorten ICU stay. Infectious complications were less frequent with percutaneous than surgical tracheostomy.

Keywords