BMC Anesthesiology (Sep 2024)

Assessment of intermediate phase post anesthesia quality of recovery and its affecting factors

  • Zekarias Markos,
  • Hunde Amsalu,
  • Addisu Mekuanint,
  • Samson Yirga,
  • Atsedu Endale Simegn,
  • Ayenew Kassegn

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02696-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Recovery after surgery and anesthesia is dependent on patient, surgical, and anesthetic characteristics, as well as the presence of any of numerous adverse sequelae. Postoperative recovery is a complex and multidimensional process that requires a holistic view of the recovery of capacities and homeostasis after anesthesia and surgery. Objective To assess the quality of recovery after anesthesia and its affecting factors at Wachamo University Nigist Eleni Mohamed Memorial Comprehensive Hospital. Method a prospective observational study was conducted at Wachamo University Nigist Eleni Mohamed Memorial Comprehensive Hospital among 384 surgical patients who undergone under anesthesia. Quality of recovery was assessed by using Quality of Recovery 40. Student t-test and one-way ANOVA were utilized to compare the mean of Quality of recovery in different groups. Binary regression was used to find out the factors affecting Quality of recovery quality of recovery. SPSS 27 was used for analysis. A p-value of /= 7 during discharge and prolonged duration of surgery were the factors that had a significant association with poor quality of recovery. Conclusion The magnitude of good quality of recovery was 65.6% whereas 34.4% scored poor quality of recovery. The predictors for the prevalence of poor quality of recovery were found to be orthopedic procedures; procedures undergone under general anesthesia; incidence of post-anesthesia nausea and vomiting; prolonged length of the procedure and severity of pain.

Keywords