International Journal of Infectious Diseases (Feb 2021)

Association of miltefosine with granulocyte and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Amazon region: A randomized and controlled trial

  • Luciana Mendes,
  • Jorge Oliveira Guerra,
  • Bleno Costa,
  • Aríneia Soares da Silva,
  • Maria das Graças Barbosa Guerra,
  • Jéssica Ortiz,
  • Susan Smith Doria,
  • George Villarouco da Silva,
  • Denison Vital de Jesus,
  • Manoel Barral-Netto,
  • Gerson Penna,
  • Edgar M. Carvalho,
  • Paulo R.L. Machado

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 103
pp. 358 – 363

Abstract

Read online

Objectives: To compare topical granulocyte and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and miltefosine (G + M) versus placebo and miltefosine (P + M) or parenteral meglumine antimoniate (MA) in the treatment of 150 patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) caused by Leishmania guyanensis in the Amazon. Design: A randomized and double-blinded clinical trial. Results: At 90 days after the initiation of therapy, the cure rates were 66%, 58%, and 52% for the groups P + M, G + M, and MA, respectively (p > 0.05). Cure rates at 180 days did not differ. Healing time was similar in the 3 groups, but faster in the MA group as compared to the G + M group (p = 0.04). Mild and transitory systemic adverse events were frequent in all groups (above 85%). Nausea (85%) and vomiting (39%) predominated in the miltefosine groups and arthralgia (51%) and myalgia (48%) in the MA group. One patient (group MA) stopped treatment after presenting with fever, exanthema, and severe arthralgia. Conclusions: Miltefosine did not present a higher cure rate than MA, and the association of GM-CSF did not improve the therapeutic response. Nevertheless, because of its less toxicity, easier administration, and a similar cure rate when compared with MA, miltefosine should remain as one of the main drugs for treating CL due to L. guyanensis.(Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03023111).

Keywords