Influencing factors for peripheral and posterior lesions in mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy—the Kailuan Eye Study

Abstract

AIM: To explore the influencing factors of diabetes type 2 patients with mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) in the Kailuan area of Tangshan, Hebei Province, China. METHODS: In this non-interventional, retrospective study, 683 patients with type 2 diabetes were included in the Kailuan Diabetic Retinopathy Study involving participants with diabetes in the community-based longitudinal Kailuan Study. Based on the undilated ultra-wide field (200°; UWF) images and partial dilated digital fundus images, the diabetic retinopathy (DR) of the surveyed population was graded. Interobserver agreement was estimated by using Cohen’s Kappa statistics. The main outcome indicators included gender, age, weight, height, body mass index, blood pressure, circumferences of neck, waist and hip, current smoking, levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), hypersensitive C-reactive protein, creatinine, and cholesterol, etc. According to different lesions’ locations of patients with mild NPDR, logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95%CIs of each risk factor. RESULTS: The study group of 683 patients included 570 males and 113 females. The mean age of the patients was 62.18±9.41y. Compared with dilated fundus examinations, there was fair agreement with the level of DR identified on UWF images in 63.91% of eyes (k=0.369, 95%CI, 0.00-0.00). Detected by UWF images, there were 98 patients with mild NPDR having peripheral retinal lesions, 35 patients with mild NPDR having posterior lesions, 44 patients with mild NPDR whose lesions were detected both in and out the standard two fields area, and 336 patients with non obvious DR. Parameters that conferred a statistically significant increased risks for mild NPDR with having peripheral retinal lesions were neck circumstance (OR, 1.124; 95%CI, 1.044-1.211), and with posterior lesions were FPG (OR, 1.052; 95%CI, 1.007-1.099). CONCLUSION: UWF is an effectiveness means of DR screening. Moreover, it is necessary to evaluate peripheral diabetic retinal lesions which can help to estimate the severity of DR. The phenomenon that nonuniform and inhomogeneous distribution of DR lesions has been found. And the influencing factors in mild NPDR are differing by different lesions’ locations.

Keywords

• diabetic retinopathy
• ultra-wide field image
• neck circumference
• peripheral lesions
• fasting plasma glucose
• posterior pole lesions