Frontiers in Public Health (Jul 2024)

School knowledge of infectious diseases in schools: conducting surveillance and on-demand, symptomatic respiratory viral testing in a large pre-kindergarten–12th grade school district

  • Jennifer E. Schuster,
  • Tamoor T. Chohdry,
  • Chris T. Young,
  • Brian R. Lee,
  • Dithi Banerjee,
  • Anjana Sasidharan,
  • Olivia M. Almendares,
  • Hannah L. Kirking,
  • Janelle Porter,
  • Anila Deliu,
  • Shannon Tilsworth,
  • Rangaraj Selvarangan,
  • Jennifer L. Goldman

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1408281
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundLimited data about acute respiratory illness (ARI) and respiratory virus circulation are available in congregate community settings, specifically schools. To better characterize the epidemiology of ARI and respiratory viruses in schools, we developed School Knowledge of Infectious Diseases in Schools (School KIDS).MethodsSchool KIDS is a prospective, respiratory viral testing program in a large metropolitan school district (pre-kindergarten–12th grade) in Kansas City, Missouri. During the 2022–2023 school year, all students and staff were eligible to participate in surveillance respiratory viral testing at school by submitting observed self-administered nasal swabs monthly. Participants could also submit a nasal swab for on-demand symptomatic testing when experiencing ≥1 ARI symptom, including cough, fever, nasal congestion, runny nose, shortness of breath, sore throat, and/or wheezing. Swabs were tested in a research laboratory using multipathogen respiratory polymerase chain reaction assays. Participants were evaluated for ongoing viral shedding by collecting two weekly nasal swabs (i.e., convalescent), following initial on-demand symptomatic testing. Participants were asked to complete an electronic survey to capture the presence and type of ARI symptom(s) before the collection of respiratory swabs.ResultsFrom 31 October 2022 to 29 June 2023, School KIDS enrolled 978 participants, including 700 students, representing 3.4% of the district student population, and 278 staff members. Participants submitted a median of six surveillance, one symptomatic, and two convalescent specimens during the study period. A total of 6,315 respiratory specimens, including 4,700 surveillance, 721 on-demand symptomatic, and 894 convalescent specimens, were tested. Overall, a virus was detected in 1,168 (24.9%) surveillance and 363 (50.3%) symptomatic specimens. Of the 5,538 symptom surveys sent to participants before scheduled surveillance testing, 4,069 (73.5%) were completed; ARI symptoms were reported on 1,348 (33.1%) surveys.ConclusionRespiratory surveillance testing in schools is feasible and provides novel information about respiratory virus detections in students and staff attending school. Schools are an important community setting, and better knowledge of respiratory virus circulation in schools may be useful to identify respiratory virus transmission in the community and assess the impact of effective infection prevention measures.

Keywords