Cancer Imaging (May 2024)

Multi-institutional validation of a radiomics signature for identification of postoperative progression of soft tissue sarcoma

  • Yuan Yu,
  • Hongwei Guo,
  • Meng Zhang,
  • Feng Hou,
  • Shifeng Yang,
  • Chencui Huang,
  • Lisha Duan,
  • Hexiang Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00705-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics signature for evaluating the risk of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) disease progression. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 335 patients with STS (training, validation, and The Cancer Imaging Archive sets, n = 168, n = 123, and n = 44, respectively) who underwent surgical resection. Regions of interest were manually delineated using two MRI sequences. Among 12 machine learning-predicted signatures, the best signature was selected, and its prediction score was inputted into Cox regression analysis to build the radiomics signature. A nomogram was created by combining the radiomics signature with a clinical model constructed using MRI and clinical features. Progression-free survival was analyzed in all patients. We assessed performance and clinical utility of the models with reference to the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve, concordance index, integrated Brier score, decision curve analysis. Results For the combined features subset, the minimum redundancy maximum relevance-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression algorithm + decision tree classifier had the best prediction performance. The radiomics signature based on the optimal machine learning-predicted signature, and built using Cox regression analysis, had greater prognostic capability and lower error than the nomogram and clinical model (concordance index, 0.758 and 0.812; area under the curve, 0.724 and 0.757; integrated Brier score, 0.080 and 0.143, in the validation and The Cancer Imaging Archive sets, respectively). The optimal cutoff was − 0.03 and cumulative risk rates were calculated. Data conclusion To assess the risk of STS progression, the radiomics signature may have better prognostic power than a nomogram/clinical model.

Keywords