ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research (May 2024)

Clinical and Economic Value of a Biosimilar Portfolio to Stakeholders: An Integrative Literature Review

  • Fox GE,
  • Bernauer M,
  • Stephens JM,
  • Jackson B,
  • Roth JA,
  • Shelbaya A

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 16
pp. 247 – 416

Abstract

Read online

Grace E Fox,1 Mark Bernauer,1 Jennifer M Stephens,1 Bianca Jackson,1 Joshua A Roth,2 Ahmed Shelbaya2,3 1Strategic Market Access, OPEN Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; 2Global Access and Value, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA; 3Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USACorrespondence: Mark Bernauer, Strategic Market Access, OPEN Health, Bethesda, MD, USA, Tel +1 240 821-1292, Email [email protected]: While the value of individual biosimilars is evident, little is known about the value of a biosimilar portfolio beyond the cost savings between biosimilars and originators. Stakeholders may consider the value of a manufacturer’s biosimilar portfolio, especially when negotiating portfolio-based contracts or other rebate programs. However, little is known about what other types of value, in addition to financial benefits, decision-makers perceive regarding a manufacturer with a biosimilar portfolio compared to those without one. The objective of this integrative literature review was to describe a conceptual framework consisting of themes that may help define the value of a biosimilar portfolio.Methods: An integrative literature review was conducted using Excerpta Medica Database (Embase) and Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE). Grey literature searches of search engines, journals not indexed in Embase or MEDLINE, healthcare payers, health technology assessment bodies, value frameworks, and non-pharmaceutical industry analogs were also conducted. Eligible studies reported on the value of a biosimilar portfolio in decision-making by stakeholders. Apart from the literature, insights were gained from clinical experience and observation.Results: No studies investigating biosimilar portfolio value were identified; however, several themes were identified that may help define the value of a biosimilar portfolio: Manufacturing; procurement, inventory, and storage; administration; education; and transaction costs. Several non-pharmaceutical industry analogs were identified: Product line length and single-supplier versus multiple-supplier procurement. Several themes were identified through other sources: Science credibility and research. Based on these themes, we developed a conceptual framework for biosimilar portfolio value.Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically assess and create a framework for biosimilar portfolio value. The conceptual framework described here could be tested to quantify the clinical and economic value associated with a biosimilar portfolio.Plain Language Summary: Though the value of single biosimilars is evident, little is known about the value of a biosimilar portfolio beyond the cost savings incurred between biosimilars and originators.We identified seven themes that may help to define the value of a biosimilar portfolio: Manufacturing; procurement, inventory, and storage; administration; education; transaction costs; science credibility; and research.These themes may be integrated into a conceptual framework that may form a basis to help quantify the clinical and economic benefit of a biosimilar portfolio to stakeholders.Keywords: biosimilar, portfolio, value, analog

Keywords