Clinical Ophthalmology (Nov 2023)

Exploring Nomograms for Implantable Collamer Lens Size Selection in Myopia: A Literature-based Compilation

  • Moshirfar M,
  • Santos JM,
  • Cha DS,
  • Herron M,
  • Stoakes IM,
  • Hoopes PC

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 17
pp. 3307 – 3322

Abstract

Read online

Majid Moshirfar,1– 3 Jordan M Santos,4 David S Cha,5 Michael Herron,6 Isabella M Stoakes,1,7 Phillip C Hoopes1 1Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA; 2John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 3Utah Lions Eye Bank, Murray, UT, USA; 4University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA; 5Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA; 6University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA; 7Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, WA, USACorrespondence: Majid Moshirfar, Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State St. #200, Draper, UT, 84020, USA, Tel +1 801-568-0200, Fax +1 801-563-0200, Email [email protected]: To provide a comprehensive guide of all implantable collamer lens (ICL) sizing nomograms and the respective preoperative diagnostic devices that are required. This guide would help clinicians in choosing the appropriate ICL size for myopic patients to optimize postoperative vault height.Methods: A literature search of peer-reviewed journals describing methods and postoperative outcomes of ICL sizing was conducted. Research articles containing ICL nomograms or formulas were identified from this search. Preoperative variables necessary for these nomograms and the required diagnostic devices to measure these parameters such as topography, biometry, or ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) were noted. An additional search was conducted to identify artificial intelligence (AI) or machine learning (ML)-derived nomograms.Results: Eighteen ICL sizing nomograms were identified through literature search. Five of these nomograms are available for use and require topography or biometry devices. Of these, four include the manufacturer’s, optimized white-to-white (WTW), Kang, Kim, and Rocamora Nomograms. Eight of the 18 nomograms available for use require UBM. Eight of these include the Kojima, Nakamura, KS, ZZ, Dougherty, Parkhurst, Russo, and Reinstein Nomograms. Four of the 18 nomograms are ML-derived including Shen, Rocamora, Russo, and Kang Nomograms.Conclusion: ICL nomograms are a vital tool in helping clinicians select the right ICL size for myopic patients to optimize postoperative vault reducing risk of postoperative complications. Based on available diagnostic devices such as topography, biometry, or UBM clinicians can integrate specific nomograms into practice.Keywords: phakic intraocular lens, pIOL, myopia, implantable contact lens, EVO, Visian ICL, artificial intelligence, machine learning model, ICL sizing, ICL formula

Keywords