Genome Medicine (May 2018)

Integrated time course omics analysis distinguishes immediate therapeutic response from acquired resistance

  • Genevieve Stein-O’Brien,
  • Luciane T. Kagohara,
  • Sijia Li,
  • Manjusha Thakar,
  • Ruchira Ranaweera,
  • Hiroyuki Ozawa,
  • Haixia Cheng,
  • Michael Considine,
  • Sandra Schmitz,
  • Alexander V. Favorov,
  • Ludmila V. Danilova,
  • Joseph A. Califano,
  • Evgeny Izumchenko,
  • Daria A. Gaykalova,
  • Christine H. Chung,
  • Elana J. Fertig

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-018-0545-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
pp. 1 – 22

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Targeted therapies specifically act by blocking the activity of proteins that are encoded by genes critical for tumorigenesis. However, most cancers acquire resistance and long-term disease remission is rarely observed. Understanding the time course of molecular changes responsible for the development of acquired resistance could enable optimization of patients’ treatment options. Clinically, acquired therapeutic resistance can only be studied at a single time point in resistant tumors. Methods To determine the dynamics of these molecular changes, we obtained high throughput omics data (RNA-sequencing and DNA methylation) weekly during the development of cetuximab resistance in a head and neck cancer in vitro model. The CoGAPS unsupervised algorithm was used to determine the dynamics of the molecular changes associated with resistance during the time course of resistance development. Results CoGAPS was used to quantify the evolving transcriptional and epigenetic changes. Applying a PatternMarker statistic to the results from CoGAPS enabled novel heatmap-based visualization of the dynamics in these time course omics data. We demonstrate that transcriptional changes result from immediate therapeutic response or resistance, whereas epigenetic alterations only occur with resistance. Integrated analysis demonstrates delayed onset of changes in DNA methylation relative to transcription, suggesting that resistance is stabilized epigenetically. Conclusions Genes with epigenetic alterations associated with resistance that have concordant expression changes are hypothesized to stabilize the resistant phenotype. These genes include FGFR1, which was associated with EGFR inhibitors resistance previously. Thus, integrated omics analysis distinguishes the timing of molecular drivers of resistance. This understanding of the time course progression of molecular changes in acquired resistance is important for the development of alternative treatment strategies that would introduce appropriate selection of new drugs to treat cancer before the resistant phenotype develops.

Keywords