Assessing the Predictive Accuracy of the Eaton–Littler Classification in Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Analysis with the Outerbridge Classification in a Cohort of 51 Cases

Abstract

(1) Background: The objective of this study is to evaluate the predictive value of the Eaton–Littler radiologic classification for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC OA) relating to intra-articular cartilage damage assessed by the Outerbridge arthroscopic classification. (2) Methods: A total of 51 thumb CMC OA arthroscopies were performed on patients classified as Eaton stages 1, 2, or 3. Post-arthroscopic evaluations of cartilage damage were categorized using the Outerbridge classification. Comparative analyses were conducted between the radiological Eaton stages and the arthroscopic Outerbridge stages. (3) Results: Arthroscopic examination revealed Outerbridge stage 3 and 4 cartilage damage in 26 cases classified as Eaton stage 2 and in 18 cases classified as Eaton stage 3. The detection of severe cartilage damage in patients classified as Eaton stage 2 was unexpected. (4) Conclusions: Arthroscopy demonstrated that many patients with mild radiological degenerative signs exhibited significant cartilage destruction. Although the Eaton classification is widely used for staging thumb CMC OA, it may not accurately reflect the severity of intra-articular damage. The Eaton classification does not reliably predict intra-articular damage in Eaton stage 2 cases.

Keywords

• thumb
• osteoarthritis
• arthroscopy