IEEE Access (Jan 2024)
A Phase-Cum-Time Variant Fuzzy Time Series Model for Forecasting Non-Stationary Time Series and Its Application to the Stock Market
Abstract
Non-stationary time series plays a prominent role in the analysis of performance time series of many real-world systems. Recently, fuzzy time series models have been extended to forecast non-stationary time series. Over different phases of time, performance time series may show drastic changes. Therefore, a non-stationary time series is partitioned according to different phases of time. These phases may be taken as weeks, months, or years. Over different phases of time, the universe of discourse, knowledge base, and rule base may vary. A common constraint in the modelling of time-variant fuzzy time series is their incapability to address the phase change of time in the model and accordingly incorporate the necessary changes in the universe of discourse, knowledge base, and rule base over different time phases. To address this issue, a Phase-cum-Time Variant Fuzzy Time Series Model (PTVFTS) is presented in this paper. The PTVFTS model is developed so that it will address the problem of phase change as well as the time variations within each phase simultaneously. The concept of the model rebuilding process is applied to handle changes over each phase and the modified parameter adaptation technique is used for the time variations within each phase. The developed model is applied to the daily closing price time series for the years 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022 separately of stock market indices, NASDAQ, S&P 500, Dow Jones, and TAIEX. The comparison of the developed model is made with the time-variant fuzzy time series model known as the non-stationary fuzzy time series model (NSFTS), Dynamic Evolving Neural-Fuzzy Inference System (DENFIS) model, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model, and the classical Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model. The efficiency of the developed PTVFTS model is tested using forecasting metrics and statistical tests. The comparison shows that the developed model is more efficient in forecasting phase-cum-time variant non-stationary time series.
Keywords