Wellcome Open Research (Apr 2021)

Identifying Care Home Residents in Electronic Health Records - An OpenSAFELY Short Data Report [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

  • Anna Schultze,
  • Chris Bates,
  • Jonathan Cockburn,
  • Brian MacKenna,
  • Emily Nightingale,
  • Helen J Curtis,
  • William J Hulme,
  • Caroline E Morton,
  • Richard Croker,
  • Seb Bacon,
  • Helen I McDonald,
  • Christopher T Rentsch,
  • Krishnan Bhaskaran,
  • Rohini Mathur,
  • Laurie A Tomlinson,
  • Elizabeth J Williamson,
  • Harriet Forbes,
  • John Tazare,
  • Daniel J Grint,
  • Alex J Walker,
  • Peter Inglesby,
  • Nicholas J DeVito,
  • Amir Mehrkar,
  • George Hickman,
  • Simon Davy,
  • Tom Ward,
  • Louis Fisher,
  • David Evans,
  • Kevin Wing,
  • Angel YS Wong,
  • Robert McManus,
  • John Parry,
  • Frank Hester,
  • Sam Harper,
  • Stephen JW Evans,
  • Ian J Douglas,
  • Liam Smeeth,
  • Rosalind M Eggo,
  • Ben Goldacre

DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16737.1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6

Abstract

Read online

Background: Care home residents have been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Electronic Health Records (EHR) hold significant potential for studying the healthcare needs of this vulnerable population; however, identifying care home residents in EHR is not straightforward. We describe and compare three different methods for identifying care home residents in the newly created OpenSAFELY-TPP data analytics platform. Methods: Working on behalf of NHS England, we identified individuals aged 65 years or older potentially living in a care home on the 1st of February 2020 using (1) a complex address linkage, in which cleaned GP registered addresses were matched to old age care home addresses using data from the Care and Quality Commission (CQC); (2) coded events in the EHR; (3) household identifiers, age and household size to identify households with more than 3 individuals aged 65 years or older as potential care home residents. Raw addresses were not available to the investigators. Results: Of 4,437,286 individuals aged 65 years or older, 2.27% were identified as potential care home residents using the complex address linkage, 1.96% using coded events, 3.13% using household size and age and 3.74% using either of these methods. 53,210 individuals (32.0% of all potential care home residents) were classified as care home residents using all three methods. Address linkage had the largest overlap with the other methods; 93.3% of individuals identified as care home residents using the address linkage were also identified as such using either coded events or household age and size. Conclusion: We have described the partial overlap between three methods for identifying care home residents in EHR, and provide detailed instructions for how to implement these in OpenSAFELY-TPP to support research into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care home residents.