Designs (Sep 2022)

Wind Pressure Distribution on the Façade of Stand-Alone Atypically Shaped High-Rise Building Determined by CFD Simulation and Wind Tunnel Tests

  • Oľga Ivánková,
  • Oľga Hubová,
  • Marek Macák,
  • Eva Vojteková,
  • Lenka Bujdáková Konečná

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/designs6050077
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 5
p. 77

Abstract

Read online

The investigation of wind pressure distribution on a façade of an atypically shaped 162 m tall building is discussed in this paper. The horizontal cross-section was changed with the height of the structure (the square in the bottom part and the polygon in the top). The surface of the structure was smooth. A structural system was created using a combination of the tube structural system and exoskeleton structure. The building was stand-alone, located in urban terrain. In this case, the information in standards were not sufficient for its design. Therefore, other available tools had to be used for the determination of required input parameters (mean external pressure coefficients). At first, wind tunnel tests (WT) were performed on a reduced-scale model (1:300). Then, the obtained results were compared with data from a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. The accuracy of the simulation was evaluated by the method of three metrics. Short descriptions of the reduced-scale model, boundary layer wind tunnel, used measuring devices, and the methodology of tests are mentioned. The aim of this research was to identify the influence of the shape modification on the values of mean external pressure coefficients (in the comparison with the original shape, which was the cuboid). In the case of the cuboid, good agreement between the values determined by the CFD and the values from Eurocode was achieved. Larger discrepancies occurred on the roof. The modification of the total shape of the structure from the cuboid to atypical structure had the positive effect on the mean values of external pressure coefficients cpe. These values were smaller (at some levels significantly). Mainly, this effect was noticeable on the leeward side. For the wind directions 0° and 180°, the changes of the values were relatively large. For the other two wind directions (45° and 67.5°), the values on the windward sides were similar. The large advantage of this atypical structure is that the negative pressures on side walls and leeward side are smaller in the comparison with the cuboid. This is very useful for the fixing of façade components, where the values of negative pressures are larger than the positive pressures on the cladding in the larger heights.

Keywords