Frontiers in Pediatrics (Mar 2016)
FROM RESEARCH QUESTION TO CONDUCTING A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL ON CONTINUOUS ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN PRENATAL HYDRONEPHROSIS: A RATIONAL STEPWISE PROCESS
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives: Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP) use to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) in infants with prenatal hydronephrosis (HN) remains controversial. Lack of consensus guidelines and diverse practice patterns for postnatal management of HN highlight the dire need for higher level of evidence studies. Herein, we aim to describe the steps from developing a well-defined research question to executing a multi−center randomized controlled trial to address the issue of CAP use in patients with prenatal HN. Methods: The steps involved were: (1)choosing the proper research question, (2)survey of practice patterns and establishing clinical equipoise, (3)systematic review of the literature, (4)reviewing own practice, (5)longitudinal prospective study, (6)pilot study, (7)cost-utility analysis and (8)definitive randomized controlled trial (clinical trials registry number: NCT01140516). An update of our previous systematic review was conducted using two electronic databases and grey literature from 2010-2015. Eligibility criteria included studies of children <2 years old with postnatally confirmed prenatal HN, receiving CAP or not, and reporting on development of UTIs, capturing information on voiding cystourethrogram result and HN grade. Full−text screening was conducted by two independent reviewers. UTI rates in patients with high-grade HN were compared across different study designs. Finally, blinded comparative analysis of UTI rates between placebo and treatment groups was carried out using chi−square test.Results: UTI rates in patients with high grade HN by their respective study design were: 25% for systematic review, 20% for retrospective study, 21% for prospective and pilot studies, and 13% for the definitive RCT thus far. Regardless of the type of study design, patients with hydroureteronephrosis [HUN] had significantly higher (3−6 fold) UTI rates than those with isolated HN. Our updated systematic review yielded 486 citations, of which 9(n = 1987 infants) observational studies met eligibility criteria. Conclusions: UTI rates in patients with high−grade HN dropped from 25% in observational studies to 13% in our RCT. This decline in UTI rate demonstrates that study designs lacking strategies to minimize bias are more prone to overestimate treatment effects. These findings highlight the importance of conducting methodologically sound RCTs to answer clinically meaningful questions, such as the one presented here.
Keywords
