Frontiers in Nutrition (Dec 2024)

Waist-to-height ratio and body roundness index: superior predictors of insulin resistance in Chinese adults and take gender and age into consideration

  • Anxiang Li,
  • Anxiang Li,
  • Anxiang Li,
  • Yunwei Liu,
  • Qi Liu,
  • Qi Liu,
  • Qi Liu,
  • You Peng,
  • Qingshun Liang,
  • Qingshun Liang,
  • Qingshun Liang,
  • Yiming Tao,
  • Yiming Tao,
  • Yiming Tao,
  • Yunyi Liu,
  • Chongsong Cui,
  • Qiqi Ren,
  • Yingling Zhou,
  • Jieer Long,
  • Jieer Long,
  • Jieer Long,
  • Guanjie Fan,
  • Guanjie Fan,
  • Guanjie Fan,
  • Qiyun Lu,
  • Qiyun Lu,
  • Qiyun Lu,
  • Zhenjie Liu,
  • Zhenjie Liu,
  • Zhenjie Liu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1480707
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

Background and objectivesMetabolic disease has become a global health concern, and insulin resistance (IR) is a crucial underlying mechanism in various metabolic diseases. This study aims to compare the ability of seven anthropometric indicators in predicting IR in the Chinese population, and to find more sensitive and simple anthropometric indicator for early identification of IR.MethodsThis prospective cross-sectional study obtained participants’ medical history, anthropometric indicators, and serum samples from three hospitals in China. Various anthropometric indicators were calculated, including body mass index (BMI), Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WtHR), conicity index (CI), A Body Shape Index (ABSI), body roundness index (BRI), abdominal volume index (AVI). The evaluation of IR is performed using the homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Logistic regression analysis examined the relationship between indicators and HOMA-IR. The ability of the anthropometric indicators to predict IR was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Additionally, a stratified analysis was performed to evaluate the ability of the indicators in different age and gender groups.ResultsThe study included 1,592 adult subjects, with 531 in the non-IR group and 1,061 in the IR group. After adjusting for confounding factors, the anthropometric indicators showed a positive correlation with IR in the general population and across different genders and age groups (OR > 1, p < 0.05), except for ABSI. In the ROC curve analysis, WtHR and BRI had the highest AUC values of 0.711 for detecting IR. The optimal cut-off value for WtHR to diagnose IR was 0.53, while for BRI, it was 4.00. In the gender-stratified and age-stratified analysis, BMI, WtHR, BRI, and AVI all had AUC values >0.700 in females and individuals below 60.ConclusionWtHR and BRI demonstrated a better ability to predict IR in the overall study population, making them preferred indicators for screening IR, and gender and age are important considerations. In the stratified analysis of different genders or age, BMI, WtHR, BRI, and AVI are also suitable for detecting IR in women or individuals under 60 years old in this study.Clinical trial registrationwww.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100054654.

Keywords