Structural Study of Model Rhodium(I) Carbonylation Catalysts Activated by Indole-2-/Indoline-2-Carboxylate Bidentate Ligands and Kinetics of Iodomethane Oxidative Addition

Abstract

The rigid-backbone bidentate ligands Indoline-2-carboxylic acid (IndoliH) and Indole-2-carboxylic acid (IndolH) were evaluated for rhodium(I). IndoliH formed [Rh(Indoli)(CO)(PPh3)] (A2), while IndolH yielded the novel dinuclear [Rh1(Indol’)(CO)(PPh3)Rh2(CO)(PPh3)2] (B2) complex (Indol’ = Indol2−), which were characterized by SCXRD. In B2, the Rh1(I) fragment [Rh1(Indol’)(CO)(PPh3)] (bidentate N,O-Indol) exhibits a square-planar geometry, while Rh2(I) shows a ‘Vaska’-type trans-[O-Rh2(PPh3)2(CO)] configuration (bridging the carboxylate ‘oxo’ O atom of Indol2−). The oxidative addition of MeI to A2 and B2 via time-resolved FT-IR, NMR, and UV/Vis analyses indicated only Rh(III)-alkyl species (A3/B3) as products (no migratory insertion). Variable temperature kinetics confirmed an associative mechanism for A2 via an equilibrium-based pathway (ΔH≠ = (21 ± 1) kJ mol−1; ΔS≠ = (−209 ± 4) J K−1mol−1), with a smaller contribution from a reverse reductive elimination/solvent pathway. The dinuclear complex B2 showed the oxidative addition of MeI only at Rh1(I), which formed a Rh(III)-alkyl, but cleaved the bridged Rh2(I) site, yielding trans-[RhI(PPh3)2(I)(CO)] (5B) as a secondary product. A significantly smaller negative activation entropy [ΔH≠ = (73.0 ± 1.2) kJ mol−1; ΔS≠ = (−21 ± 4) J K−1mol−1] via a more complex/potential interchange mechanism (the contribution of ΔS≠ to the Gibbs free energy of activation, ΔG≠, only ±10%) was inferred, contrary to the entropy-driven oxidative addition of MeI to A2 (the contribution of ΔS≠ to ΔG≠ ± 75%).

Keywords

• kinetics
• crystal structures
• iodomethane
• oxidative addition
• rhodium
• Indole-2-carboxylate