Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (Jun 2022)

Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review

  • Silvia Campagnini,
  • Chiara Arienti,
  • Michele Patrini,
  • Piergiuseppe Liuzzi,
  • Andrea Mannini,
  • Maria Chiara Carrozza

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01032-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
pp. 1 – 22

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Rehabilitation medicine is facing a new development phase thanks to a recent wave of rigorous clinical trials aimed at improving the scientific evidence of protocols. This phenomenon, combined with new trends in personalised medical therapies, is expected to change clinical practice dramatically. The emerging field of Rehabilomics is only possible if methodologies are based on biomedical data collection and analysis. In this framework, the objective of this work is to develop a systematic review of machine learning algorithms as solutions to predict motor functional recovery of post-stroke patients after treatment. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search of five electronic databases using the Patient, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO) format. We extracted health conditions, population characteristics, outcome assessed, the method for feature extraction and selection, the algorithm used, and the validation approach. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). A qualitative description of the characteristics of the included studies as well as a narrative data synthesis was performed. Results A total of 19 primary studies were included. The predictors most frequently used belonged to the areas of demographic characteristics and stroke assessment through clinical examination. Regarding the methods, linear and logistic regressions were the most frequently used and cross-validation was the preferred validation approach. Conclusions We identified several methodological limitations: small sample sizes, a limited number of external validation approaches, and high heterogeneity among input and output variables. Although these elements prevented a quantitative comparison across models, we defined the most frequently used models given a specific outcome, providing useful indications for the application of more complex machine learning algorithms in rehabilitation medicine.

Keywords