Medicina (Feb 2023)

Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

  • Zita Zsombor,
  • Aladár D. Rónaszéki,
  • Barbara Csongrády,
  • Róbert Stollmayer,
  • Bettina K. Budai,
  • Anikó Folhoffer,
  • Ildikó Kalina,
  • Gabriella Győri,
  • Viktor Bérczi,
  • Pál Maurovich-Horvat,
  • Krisztina Hagymási,
  • Pál Novák Kaposi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030469
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 59, no. 3
p. 469

Abstract

Read online

Background and Objectives: This study aims to evaluate artificial intelligence-calculated hepatorenal index (AI-HRI) as a diagnostic method for hepatic steatosis. Materials and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 102 patients with clinically suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). All patients had a quantitative ultrasound (QUS), including AI-HRI, ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC,) and ultrasound backscatter-distribution coefficient (SC) measurements. The ultrasonographic fatty liver indicator (US-FLI) score was also calculated. The magnetic resonance imaging fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) was the reference to classify patients into four grades of steatosis: none s) between the methods. We determined the agreement between AI-HRI by two examiners using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 68 cases. We performed a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to estimate the area under the curve (AUC) for AI-HRI. Results: The mean AI-HRI was 2.27 (standard deviation, ±0.96) in the patient cohort. The AI-HRI was significantly different between groups without (1.480 ± 0.607, p p s = 0.597), SC (rs = 0.473), US-FLI (rs = 0.5), and MRI-PDFF (rs = 0.528). The agreement in AI-HRI was good between the two examiners (ICC = 0.635, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.411–0.774, p p Conclusions: AI-HRI is an easy-to-use, reproducible, and accurate QUS method for diagnosing mild and moderate hepatic steatosis.

Keywords