Remote Sensing (Apr 2023)

Using UAV Time Series to Estimate Landslides’ Kinematics Uncertainties, Case Study: Chirlești Earthflow, Romania

  • Ionuț Șandric,
  • Radu Irimia,
  • Viorel Ilinca,
  • Zenaida Chițu,
  • Ion Gheuca

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15082161
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 8
p. 2161

Abstract

Read online

This paper presents a methodology for evaluating the uncertainties caused by the misalignment between two digital elevation models in estimating landslide kinematics. The study focuses on the earthflow near the town of Chirlești, located in the Bend Subcarpathians, Buzău County, Romania, which poses a high risk of blocking the DN10 national road. Four flights were conducted between 2018 and 2022 using a DJI Phantom 4 UAV using the same flight plan. Monte Carlo simulations were used to model uncertainty propagation of the DEM misalignments in the landslide kinematics analysis. The simulations were applied to the accuracy values of the structure from a motion process used to generate the digital elevation models. The degree of uncertainty was assessed using the displaced material’s total amount in conjunction with the spatial correlation of the displaced material between two consecutive flights. The results revealed that the increase in the RMS values did not determine an increase in the displaced earth between two UAV flights. Instead, combining the RMS values and the correlation coefficient clearly indicated the correspondence between the spatial distribution of the displaced earth material and the overall changes reported between the two UAV flights. An RMS value of up to 1 unit associated with a correlation coefficient of 0.95 could be considered the maximum allowable error for estimating landslide kinematics across space and time. The current methodology is reliable when studying slow-movement landslides and when using short intervals between UAV flights. For rapid movements or significant terrain changes, such as translational and rotational landslides, careful analysis of the correlation coefficient in conjunction with the RMS values is recommended.

Keywords