JMIR Formative Research (May 2024)

Prospective Acceptability of Digital Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder in France: Multicentric Real-Life Study

  • Odile Amiot,
  • Anne Sauvaget,
  • Isabelle Alamome,
  • Samuel Bulteau,
  • Thomas Charpeaud,
  • Anne-Hélène Clair,
  • Philippe Courtet,
  • Dominique Drapier,
  • Emmanuel Haffen,
  • Eric Fakra,
  • Christian Gaudeau-Bosma,
  • Adeline Gaillard,
  • Stéphane Mouchabac,
  • Fanny Pineau,
  • Véronique Narboni,
  • Anne Duburcq,
  • Laurent Lecardeur

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/53204
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8
p. e53204

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundMajor depressive disorder is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Although most international guidelines recommend psychological and psychosocial interventions as first-line treatment for mild to moderate depression, access remains limited in France due to the limited availability of trained clinicians, high costs for patients in the context of nonreimbursement, and the fear of stigmatization. Therefore, online blended psychological treatment such as Deprexis could improve access to care for people with depression. It has several advantages, such as easy accessibility and scalability, and it is supported by evidence. ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the real-life acceptability of Deprexis for people with depression in France outside of a reimbursement pathway. MethodsDeprexis Acceptability Study Measure in Real Life (DARE) was designed as a multicenter cross-sectional study in which Deprexis was offered to any patient meeting the inclusion criteria during the fixed inclusion period (June 2022-March 2023). Inclusion criteria were (1) depression, (2) age between 18 and 65 years, (3) sufficient French language skills, and (4) access to the internet with a device to connect to the Deprexis platform. Exclusion criteria were previous or current diagnoses of bipolar disorder, psychotic symptoms, and suicidal thoughts during the current episode. The primary objective was to measure the prospective acceptability of Deprexis, a new digital therapy. Secondary objectives were to examine differences in acceptability according to patient and clinician characteristics and to identify reasons for refusal. All investigators received video-based training on Deprexis before enrollment to ensure that they all had the same level of information and understanding of the program. ResultsA total of 245 patients were eligible (n=159, 64.9% were women and n=138, 56.3% were single). The mean age was 40.7 (SD 14.1) years. A total of 78% (n=191) of the patients had moderate to severe depression (according to the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]). More than half of the population had another psychiatric comorbidity (excluding bipolar disorder, psychotic disorders, and suicidal ideation). A total of 33.9% (n=83) of patients accepted the idea of using Deprexis; the main reason for refusal was financial at 83.3% (n=135). Multivariate logistic regression identified factors that might favor the acceptability of Deprexis. Among these, being a couple, being treated with an antidepressant, or having a low severity level favored the acceptance of Deprexis. ConclusionsDARE is the first French study aiming at evaluating the prospective acceptability of digital therapy in the treatment of depression. The main reason for the refusal of Deprexis was financial. DARE will allow better identification of factors influencing acceptability in a natural setting. This study highlights the importance of investigating factors that may be associated with the acceptability of digital interventions, such as marital status, medication use, and severity of depression.