PLoS ONE (Jan 2017)

Recommendations for patient engagement in guideline development panels: A qualitative focus group study of guideline-naïve patients.

  • Melissa J Armstrong,
  • C Daniel Mullins,
  • Gary S Gronseth,
  • Anna R Gagliardi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174329
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 3
p. e0174329

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND:Patient and consumer engagement in clinical practice guideline development is internationally advocated, but limited research explores mechanisms for successful engagement. OBJECTIVE:To investigate the perspectives of potential patient/consumer guideline representatives on topics pertaining to engagement including guideline development group composition and barriers to and facilitators of engagement. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:Participants were guideline-naïve volunteers for programs designed to link community members to academic research with diverse ages, gender, race, and degrees of experience interacting with health care professionals. METHODS:Three focus groups and one key informant interview were conducted and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach. RESULTS:Participants recommended small, diverse guideline development groups engaging multiple patient/consumer stakeholders with no prior relationships with each other or professional panel members. No consensus was achieved on the ideal balance of patient/consumer and professional stakeholders. Pre-meeting reading/training and an identified contact person were described as keys to successful early engagement; skilled facilitators, understandable speech and language, and established mechanisms for soliciting patient opinions were suggested to enhance engagement at meetings. CONCLUSIONS:Most suggestions for effective patient/consumer engagement in guidelines require forethought and planning but little additional expense, making these strategies easily accessible to guideline developers desiring to achieve more meaningful patient and consumer engagement.