Clinics ()

Effectiveness and safety of first-generation protease inhibitors in real-world patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in Brazil: a multicenter study

  • Luciana Azevedo Callefi,
  • Cristiane Alves Villela-Nogueira,
  • Simone de Barros Tenore,
  • Dimas Carnaúba-Júnior,
  • Henrique Sérgio Moraes Coelho,
  • Paulo de Tarso A. Pinto,
  • Letícia Cancella Nabuco,
  • Mário Guimarães Pessoa,
  • Maria Lucia Cardoso Gomes Ferraz,
  • Paulo Roberto Abrão Ferreira,
  • Ana de Lourdes Candolo Martinelli,
  • Silvana Gama Florencio Chachá,
  • Adalgisa de Souza Paiva Ferreira,
  • Alessandra Porto de Macedo Bisio,
  • Carlos Eduardo Brandão-Mello,
  • Mário Reis Álvares-Da-Silva,
  • Tânia Reuter,
  • Claudia Alexandra Pontes Ivantes,
  • Renata de Mello Perez,
  • Maria Cássia Jacintho Mendes-Correa

DOI
https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(06)08
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 72, no. 6
pp. 378 – 385

Abstract

Read online

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of first-generation protease inhibitors for the treatment of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus-infected patients at Brazilian reference centers. METHODS: This multicenter cross-sectional study included hepatitis C virus genotype 1 monoinfected patients treated with Peg-interferon, ribavirin, and either boceprevir (n=158) or telaprevir (n=557) between July 2013 and April 2014 at 15 reference centers in Brazil. Demographic, clinical, virological, and adverse events data were collected during treatment and follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 715 patients, 59% had cirrhosis and 67.1% were treatment-experienced. Based on intention-to-treat analysis, the overall sustained viral response was 56.6%, with similar effectiveness in both groups (51.9% for boceprevir and 58% for telaprevir, p=0.190). Serious adverse events occurred in 44.2% of patients, and six deaths (0.8%) were recorded. Cirrhotic patients had lower sustained viral response rates than non-cirrhotic patients (46.9% vs. 70.6%, p65 years, diagnosis of cirrhosis, and abnormal hemoglobin levels/platelet counts prior to treatment were associated with serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Although serious adverse events rates were higher in this infected population, sustained viral response rates were similar to those reported for other patient cohorts.

Keywords