Journal of the International AIDS Society (Jan 2010)
High rate of loss to clinical follow up among African HIV‐infected patients attending a London clinic: a retrospective analysis of a clinical cohort
Abstract
Background Long‐term regular clinic follow up is an important component of HIV care. We determined the frequency and characteristics of HIV‐infected patients lost to follow up from a London HIV clinic, and factors associated with loss to all HIV follow up in the UK. Methods We identified 1859 HIV‐infected adults who had registered and attended a London clinic on one or more occasions between January 1997 and December 2005. Loss to follow up was defined as clinic non‐attendance for one or more years. Through anonymized linkage with the Survey of Prevalent HIV Infections Diagnosed and Health Protection Scotland, national databases of all HIV patients in care in the UK up to December 2006, loss‐to‐follow‐up patients were categorized as Transfers (subsequently received care at another UK HIV clinic) or UKLFU (no record of subsequent attendance at any HIV clinic in the UK). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with UKLFU for those both on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and not on HAART. Results In total, 722 (38.8%) of 1859 patients were defined as lost to follow up. Of these, 347 (48.1%) were Transfers and 375 (51.9%), or 20.2% of all patients, were UKLFU. Overall, 11.9% of all patients receiving HAART, and 32.2% not receiving HAART were UKLFU. Among those on HAART, risk factors for UKLFU were: African heterosexual female (OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.11‐4.56) versus white men who have sex with men; earlier year of HIV clinic registration (1997‐1999 OR: 3.51, 95% CI: 1.97‐6.26; 2000‐02 OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.43‐4.32 vs. 2003‐2005); CD4 count of 350 cells/mm3 (OR = 1.99, 95% CI:1.05‐3.74); and a detectable viral load of > 400 copies/ml (OR = 5.03, 95% CI: 2.95‐8.57 vs. ≤ 400 copies/ml) at last clinic visit. Among those not receiving HAART, factors were: African heterosexual male (OR = 3.91, 95% CI: 1.77‐8.64) versus white men who have sex with men; earlier HIV clinic registration (2000‐2002 OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.77‐4.78; 1997‐1999: OR: 5.26, 95% CI: 2.71‐10.19); and a CD4 count of < 200 cells/mm3 (OR: 3.24, 95% CI: 1.49‐7.04). Conclusions One in five HIV‐infected patients (one in three not on HAART and one in nine on HAART) from a London clinic were lost to all clinical follow up in the UK. Black African ethnicity, earlier year of clinic registration and advanced immunological suppression were the most important predictors of UKLFU. There is a need for all HIV clinics to establish systems for monitoring and tracing loss‐to‐follow‐up patients, and to implement strategies for improving retention in care.