Remote Sensing (Nov 2023)

A Method of Chestnut Forest Identification Based on Time Series and Key Phenology from Sentinel-2

  • Nina Xiong,
  • Hailong Chen,
  • Ruiping Li,
  • Huimin Su,
  • Shouzheng Dai,
  • Jia Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225374
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 22
p. 5374

Abstract

Read online

Chestnut trees hold a prominent position in China as an economically significant forest species, offering both high economic value and ecological advantages. Identifying the distribution of chestnut forests is of paramount importance for enhancing efficient management practices. Presently, many studies are employing remote sensing imaging methods to monitor tree species. However, in comparison to the common classification of land cover types, the accuracy of tree species identification is relatively lower. This study focuses on accurately mapping the distribution of planted chestnut forests in China, particularly in the Huairou and Miyun regions, which are the main producing areas for Yanshan chestnuts in northeastern Beijing. We utilized the Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud platform and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery to develop a method based on vegetation phenological features. This method involved identifying three distinct phenological periods of chestnut trees: flowering, fruiting, and dormancy, and extracting relevant spectral, vegetation, and terrain features. With these features, we further established and compared three machine learning algorithms for chestnut species identification: random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and support vector machine (SVM). Our results indicated that the recognition accuracy of these algorithms ranked in descending order as RF > DT > SVM. We found that combining multiple phenological characteristics significantly improved the accuracy of chestnut forest distribution identification. Using the random forest algorithm and Sentinel-2 phenological features, we achieved an impressive overall accuracy (OA) of 98.78%, a Kappa coefficient of 0.9851, and a user’s accuracy (UA) and producer’s accuracy (PA) of 97.25% and 98.75%, respectively, for chestnut identification. When compared to field surveys and official area statistics, our method exhibited an accuracy rate of 89.59%. The implementation of this method not only offers crucial data support for soil erosion prevention and control studies in Beijing but also serves as a valuable reference for future research endeavors in this field.

Keywords