Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes (Dec 2017)

Overall Cost Comparison of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures With Endoscopist- or Anesthesia-Supported Sedation by Activity-Based Costing Techniques

  • Richard A. Helmers, MD,
  • James A. Dilling, MBA/HCM,
  • Christopher R. Chaffee, MBA,
  • Mark V. Larson, MD,
  • Bradly J. Narr, MD,
  • Derek A. Haas, MBA,
  • Robert S. Kaplan, PhD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 1, no. 3
pp. 234 – 241

Abstract

Read online

Objective: Endoscopic/colonoscopic procedures are either done with gastroenterologist-administered conscious sedation or with anesthesia-administered sedation with propofol. There are potential benefits to anesthesia-administered sedation, but the concern has been the associated increased cost. Methods: To perform this study, we used the time-derived activity-based costing (TDABC) technique to accurately assess the true cost of gastrointestinal procedures done with gastroenterologist-administered conscious sedation vs anesthesia-administered sedation in 2 areas of our practice that use predominantly conscious sedation or anesthesia-administered sedation. This type of study has never been reported using such an integrated approach. This study was performed on 2 different days in June 2015. Results: The true cost associated with anesthesia-administered sedation in our practice was associated with only 9% to 24% greater cost when the TDABC technique was applied. Conclusion: Gastrointestinal procedures with anesthesia-administered sedation are not as costly when all factors are considered. Using novel approaches to cost measurement, such as the TDABC, allows a total cost measurement approach across an episode of care that existing cost measurements in health care are incapable of.