Ligand Substituent Effects on the Electronic Properties of Lindqvist‐Type Polyoxometalate Multi‐Level‐Switches in the Gas Phase, Solution and on Surfaces

Abstract

Abstract Although the intrinsic electronic properties of polyoxometalates (POMs) can be greatly influenced by modifying them with organic substituents, their resistive switching behavior on surfaces dependent on the organic substituents remains largely unexplored. In this work, we assessed the importance of electron‐withdrawing and electron‐donating ligand substituents on the material properties of a series of hybrid Lindqvist‐type hexavanadates TBA2[V6O13((OCH2)3CCH2OH)2] (TBA2V6‐OH), TBA2[V6O13((OCH2)3CMe)2] (TBA2V6‐Me), TBA2[V6O13((OCH2)3CNHCOCH2Cl)2] (TBA2V6‐Cl), and TBA2[V6O13((OCH2)3CNHCOCH2‐OOCC10H15)2] (TBA2V6‐Ad) as potential resistive random‐access memory (ReRAM) components. Compared to their redox behavior in solution, changing the ligand substituents on surfaces results in no significant effect on the potential and, thus, no effect on the resistance steps in the current‐voltage profiles. However, while the current‐voltage characteristics do not change, the peripheral metal‐free substituents in the trisalkoxide framework of Lindqvist‐type hexavanadate molecules influence the adsorption and switching stability of these POMs on gold. This work highlights the noticeable differences between hexavanadate's redox properties in solution (which follow the trend observed in the gas phase) and hexavanadate's resistive switching properties on conducting surfaces. Importantly, their multi‐state switching behavior is not significantly altered by the different type of substituent at the periphery of the trisalkoxo ligands.

Keywords

• gas phase characterization
• ion soft‐landing
• ligand substituent effects
• molecular electronics
• molecular switching
• polyoxovanadate