Clinical Epigenetics (Oct 2024)

The role of DNA methylation in chondrogenesis of human iPSCs as a stable marker of cartilage quality

  • Ghazaleh Hajmousa,
  • Rodrigo Coutinho de Almeida,
  • Niek Bloks,
  • Alejandro Rodríguez Ruiz,
  • Marga Bouma,
  • Roderick Slieker,
  • Thomas B. Kuipers,
  • Rob G. H. H. Nelissen,
  • Keita Ito,
  • Christian Freund,
  • Yolande F. M. Ramos,
  • Ingrid Meulenbelt

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-024-01759-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 16

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Lack of insight into factors that determine purity and quality of human iPSC (hiPSC)-derived neo-cartilage precludes applications of this powerful technology toward regenerative solutions in the clinical setting. Here, we set out to generate methylome-wide landscapes of hiPSC-derived neo-cartilages from different tissues-of-origin and integrated transcriptome-wide data to identify dissimilarities in set points of methylation with associated transcription and the respective pathways in which these genes act. Methods We applied in vitro chondrogenesis using hiPSCs generated from two different tissue sources: skin fibroblasts and articular cartilage. Upon differentiation toward chondrocytes, these are referred to as hFiCs and hCiC, respectively. Genome-wide DNA methylation and RNA sequencing datasets were generated of the hiPSC-derived neo-cartilages, and the epigenetically regulated transcriptome was compared to that of neo-cartilage deposited by human primary articular cartilage (hPAC). Results Methylome-wide landscapes of neo-cartilages of hiPSCs reprogrammed from two different somatic tissues were 85% similar to that of hPACs. By integration of transcriptome-wide data, differences in transcriptionally active CpGs between hCiC relative to hPAC were prioritized. Among the CpG-gene pairs lower expressed in hCiCs relative to hPACs, we identified genes such as MGP, GDF5, and CHAD enriched in closely related pathways and involved in cartilage development that likely mark phenotypic differences in chondrocyte states. Vice versa, among the CpG-gene pairs higher expressed, we identified genes such as KIF1A or NKX2-2 enriched in neurogenic pathways and likely reflecting off target differentiation. Conclusions We did not find significant variation between the neo-cartilages derived from hiPSCs of different tissue sources, suggesting that application of a robust differentiation protocol such as we applied here is more important as compared to the epigenetic memory of the cells of origin. Results of our study could be further exploited to improve quality, purity, and maturity of hiPSC-derived neo-cartilage matrix, ultimately to realize introduction of sustainable, hiPSC-derived neo-cartilage implantation into clinical practice.

Keywords