npj Precision Oncology (Aug 2024)

Integrated drug resistance and leukemic stemness gene-expression scores predict outcomes in large cohort of over 3500 AML patients from 10 trials

  • Abdelrahman H. Elsayed,
  • Xueyuan Cao,
  • Richard J. Marrero,
  • Nam H. K. Nguyen,
  • Huiyun Wu,
  • Yonhui Ni,
  • Raul C. Ribeiro,
  • Herold Tobias,
  • Peter J. Valk,
  • François Béliveau,
  • Guillaume Richard-Carpentier,
  • Josée Hébert,
  • C. Michel Zwaan,
  • Alan Gamis,
  • Edward Anders Kolb,
  • Richard Aplenc,
  • Todd A. Alonzo,
  • Soheil Meshinchi,
  • Jeffrey Rubnitz,
  • Stanley Pounds,
  • Jatinder K. Lamba

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-024-00643-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract In this study, we leveraged machine-learning tools by evaluating expression of genes of pharmacological relevance to standard-AML chemotherapy (ara-C/daunorubicin/etoposide) in a discovery-cohort of pediatric AML patients (N = 163; NCT00136084 ) and defined a 5-gene-drug resistance score (ADE-RS5) that was predictive of outcome (high MRD1 positivity p = 0.013; lower EFS p < 0.0001 and OS p < 0.0001). ADE-RS5 was integrated with a previously defined leukemic-stemness signature (pLSC6) to classify patients into four groups. ADE-RS5, pLSC6 and integrated-score was evaluated for association with outcome in one of the largest assembly of ~3600 AML patients from 10 independent cohorts (1861 pediatric and 1773 adult AML). Patients with high ADE-RS5 had poor outcome in validation cohorts and the previously reported pLSC6 maintained strong significant association in all validation cohorts. For pLSC6/ADE-RS5-integrated-score analysis, using Group-1 (low-scores for ADE-RS5 and pLSC6) as reference, Group-4 (high-scores for ADE-RS5 and pLSC6) showed worst outcome (EFS: p < 0.0001 and OS: p < 0.0001). Groups-2/3 (one high and one low-score) showed intermediate outcome (p < 0.001). Integrated score groups remained an independent predictor of outcome in multivariable-analysis after adjusting for established prognostic factors (EFS: Group 2 vs. 1, HR = 4.68, p < 0.001, Group 3 vs. 1, HR = 3.22, p = 0.01, and Group 4 vs. 1, HR = 7.26, p < 0.001). These results highlight the significant prognostic value of transcriptomics-based scores capturing disease aggressiveness through pLSC6 and drug resistance via ADE-RS5. The pLSC6 stemness score is a significant predictor of outcome and associates with high-risk group features, the ADE-RS5 drug resistance score adds further value, reflecting the clinical utility of simultaneous testing of both for optimizing treatment strategies.