Research Involvement and Engagement (Aug 2024)

Impact of a community-based participatory research project with underserved communities at risk for hepatitis C virus in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: an evaluation study

  • My Nguyen Le Thao,
  • Giang Nguyen Quoc,
  • My Do Thi An,
  • Hieu Nguyen Minh,
  • Son Pham Hong,
  • Anh Hoang Thai,
  • Phung Than Thi,
  • Vy Nguyen Thuy Thanh,
  • Ngoc Tran Thi,
  • Thuan Nguyen Minh,
  • Barnaby Flower,
  • Graham S. Cooke,
  • Mary Chambers,
  • Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-024-00619-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Participatory approaches have become a widely applied research approach. Despite their popularity, there are many challenges associated with the evaluation of participatory projects. Here we describe an evaluation of a community-based participatory research study of underserved communities in Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), Vietnam at risk for hepatitis C virus. The goals of our evaluation were to explore the main benefits and challenges of implementing and participating in a participatory study and to describe study impacts. Methods We conducted two meetings with leaders and members of the participating groups followed by in-depth interviews with 10 participants. We then held a dissemination meeting with over 70 participants, including the representatives of each group, researchers from non-governmental organizations (community-based, national and international), and govenrment officials from the Vietnam Ministry of Health and the Department of Health of HCMC. Results Results include four categories where we describe first the participatory impacts, followed by the collaborative impacts. Then we describe the benefits and challenges of creating and belonging to one of the groups, from members’ and leaders’ points of view. Finally, we describe the key suggestions that participants provided for future research. Conclusion In conclusion, the evaluation approach led to both a research reflection on the ‘success’ of the project and enabled participants themselves to reflect on the outcomes and benefits of the study from their point of view.

Keywords