Virology Journal (Apr 2023)

Molecular characterization of coxsackievirus B5 from the sputum of pneumonia children patients of Kunming, Southwest China

  • Miao Tan,
  • Jiale Suo,
  • Zhilei Zhang,
  • Wenji He,
  • Li Tan,
  • Haiyan Jiang,
  • Ming Li,
  • Juan He,
  • Yue Pan,
  • Bin Xu,
  • Lingmei Yan,
  • Songtao Bin,
  • Zhengyan Gan,
  • Yuxing Sun,
  • Hongchao Jiang,
  • Qiangming Sun,
  • Zhen Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-023-02019-w
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background CVB5 can cause respiratory infections. However, the molecular epidemiological information about CVB5 in respiratory tract samples is still limited. Here, we report five cases in which CVB5 was detected in sputum sample of pneumonia children patients from Kunming, Southwest China. Methods CVB5 isolates were obtained from sputum samples of patients with pneumonia. Whole-genome sequencing of CVB5 isolates was performed using segmented PCR, and phylogenetic, mutation and recombination analysis. The effect of mutations in the VP1 protein on hydration were analyzed by Protscale. The tertiary models of VP1 proteins were established by Colabfold, and the effect of mutations in VP1 protein on volume modifications and binding affinity were analyzed by Pymol software and PROVEAN. Results A total of five CVB5 complete genome sequences were obtained. No obvious homologous recombination signals comparing with other coxsackie B viruses were observed in the five isolates. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the five CVB5 sputum isolates were from an independent branch in genogroup E. Due to the mutation, the structure and spatial of the VP1 protein N-terminus have changed significantly. Comparing to the Faulkner (CVB5 prototype strain), PROVEAN revealed three deleterious substitutions: Y75F, N166T (KM35), T140I (KM41). The last two of the three deleterious substitutions significantly increased the hydrophobicity of the residues. Conclusions We unexpectedly found five cases of CVB5 infection instead of rhinoviruses infection during our routine surveillance of rhinoviruses in respiratory tract samples. All five patients were hospitalized with pneumonia symptoms and were not tested for enterovirus during their hospitalization. This report suggests that enterovirus surveillance in patients with respiratory symptoms should be strengthened.

Keywords