Communications Earth & Environment (Jun 2023)

Multi-scale mapping of Australia’s terrestrial and blue carbon stocks and their continental and bioregional drivers

  • Lewis Walden,
  • Oscar Serrano,
  • Mingxi Zhang,
  • Zefang Shen,
  • James Z. Sippo,
  • Lauren T. Bennett,
  • Damien T. Maher,
  • Catherine E. Lovelock,
  • Peter I. Macreadie,
  • Connor Gorham,
  • Anna Lafratta,
  • Paul S. Lavery,
  • Luke Mosley,
  • Gloria M. S. Reithmaier,
  • Jeffrey J. Kelleway,
  • Sabine Dittmann,
  • Fernanda Adame,
  • Carlos M. Duarte,
  • John Barry Gallagher,
  • Pawel Waryszak,
  • Paul Carnell,
  • Sabine Kasel,
  • Nina Hinko-Najera,
  • Rakib Hassan,
  • Madeline Goddard,
  • Alice R. Jones,
  • Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00838-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The soil in terrestrial and coastal blue carbon ecosystems is an important carbon sink. National carbon inventories require accurate assessments of soil carbon in these ecosystems to aid conservation, preservation, and nature-based climate change mitigation strategies. Here we harmonise measurements from Australia’s terrestrial and blue carbon ecosystems and apply multi-scale machine learning to derive spatially explicit estimates of soil carbon stocks and the environmental drivers of variation. We find that climate and vegetation are the primary drivers of variation at the continental scale, while ecosystem type, terrain, clay content, mineralogy and nutrients drive subregional variations. We estimate that in the top 0–30 cm soil layer, terrestrial ecosystems hold 27.6 Gt (19.6–39.0 Gt), and blue carbon ecosystems 0.35 Gt (0.20–0.62 Gt). Tall open eucalypt and mangrove forests have the largest soil carbon content by area, while eucalypt woodlands and hummock grasslands have the largest total carbon stock due to the vast areas they occupy. Our findings suggest these are essential ecosystems for conservation, preservation, emissions avoidance, and climate change mitigation because of the additional co-benefits they provide.